Advanced Placement (AP) European History Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for the AP European History Exam. Study with interactive quizzes, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Enhance your understanding of European history to ensure success on your test!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


According to Pitt's speech, what alternative role did Great Britain envision for itself during the turmoil in Europe?

  1. A leader of European revolutionaries

  2. A refuge for those fleeing persecution

  3. A primary aggressor in European conflicts

  4. A passive observer of continental affairs

The correct answer is: A refuge for those fleeing persecution

Pitt's speech highlights the vision of Great Britain as a refuge for those escaping persecution and turmoil in Europe. During the late 18th and early 19th centuries, as revolutionary movements and conflicts such as the French Revolution unfolded, Britain positioned itself as a bastion of liberal values and a safe haven for individuals seeking asylum from political repression and violence. This perspective aligns with the broader sentiment of the British government at the time, emphasizing the importance of liberty and protection for those who opposed despotism in continental Europe. The notion of Britain as a refuge underscores its identity as a nation committed to individual rights and freedoms, contrasting with the autocratic regimes that were prevalent in many European countries during that period. In this context, the alternative roles considered in the other options do not accurately represent Britain's intent as articulated by Pitt. For instance, while some may have seen Britain as a potential leader of revolutionary movements, its official stance was more about providing sanctuary rather than inciting further conflict. The idea of being a primary aggressor does not align with Britain’s diplomatic approach during the early stages of revolutionary upheaval, nor did Britain choose to remain a passive observer, as it was actively involved in shaping European affairs through diplomacy and military engagements when deemed necessary.